See the research
behind the technology.

Published title
Effects of non-surgical decompression therapy in addition to routine physical therapy on pain, range of motion, endurance, functional disability and quality of life versus routine physical therapy alone in patients with lumbar radiculopathy; a randomized controlled trial

Keep in mind
This was a combined treatment with short-term follow-up; it does not isolate decompression as a stand-alone treatment.

Published title
Effect of Nonsurgical Spinal Decompression on Intensity of Pain and Herniated Disc Volume in Subacute Lumbar Herniated Disc

Keep in mind
A small trial with limited follow-up cannot establish permanent disc repair or equivalent results with other devices.

Published title
Comparison of the short-term effects of the conventional motorized traction with non-surgical spinal decompression performed with a DRX9000 device on pain, functionality, depression, and quality of life in patients with low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation: A single-blind randomized-controlled trial

Keep in mind
Improvement within a treatment group does not establish that a branded device works better than another approach.

Published title
Restoration of disk height through non-surgical spinal decompression is associated with decreased discogenic low back pain: a retrospective cohort study

Keep in mind
Association does not prove that treatment caused the changes, regenerated a disc or prevented surgery.

Published title
Treatment of 94 outpatients with chronic discogenic low back pain with the DRX9000: a retrospective chart review

Keep in mind
Without a randomized comparison group, improvement cannot be attributed to the device alone. The authors called for controlled trials.

Published title
No effect of traction in patients with low back pain: a single centre, single blind, randomized controlled trial of Intervertebral Differential Dynamics Therapy

Keep in mind
Participants did not have radiating nerve pain. This evaluates an IDD protocol rather than DRX9000, and illustrates the mixed evidence.

Published title
Exercise only, exercise with mechanical traction, or exercise with over-door traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy, with or without consideration of status on a previously described subgrouping rule: a randomized clinical trial

Keep in mind
This was a combined exercise and traction program using a different system. It does not establish equivalent results with DRX9000 cervical treatment.

Published title
Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial

Keep in mind
Outcomes were measured at two and four weeks. The findings apply to the tested multimodal program and patient group.

Published title
High-Force Versus Low-Force Lumbar Traction in Acute Lumbar Sciatica Due to Disc Herniation: A Preliminary Randomized Trial

Keep in mind
Only 17 people participated, with no untreated comparison group. This cannot establish a preferred traction force or branded-device superiority.

Published title
Effectiveness of Mechanical Traction for Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Keep in mind
Results depend on study quality, positioning and the accompanying care. This review does not establish that all traction or decompression devices are equivalent.

Published title
Multi-wave locked system laser therapy in chronic non-specific neck pain: a double-blind placebo randomized-controlled trial

Keep in mind
Pain and disability changes did not meet the study’s thresholds for a clinically meaningful improvement. Follow-up lasted one month after treatment.

Published title
Effects of MLS Laser on pain, function, and disability in chronic non-specific low back pain: A double-blind placebo randomized-controlled trial

Keep in mind
Both groups improved. Researchers found no between-group advantage for function or disability, and follow-up was short.

Published title
Efficacy of Multiwave Locked System Laser on Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Keep in mind
Exercise was part of treatment, so this does not establish the effect of MLS alone or guarantee the same result for another neck condition.

Published title
MLS Laser Reduce Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Keep in mind
This was a small study focused on pain. It does not establish lasting benefit, restored disc structure or an advantage over every exercise program.

Published title
Short-Term Efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Alleviating Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial

Keep in mind
This was a small, short-term study of a specific protocol. Symptom improvement does not establish cartilage regrowth or equivalent results with a different MLS model.

Published title
The effect of 300 mW, 830 nm laser on chronic neck pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Keep in mind
The laser power, wavelength and treatment protocol differ from MLS. These findings should not be transferred directly to another device.

Published title
Low-level laser therapy for acute neck pain with radiculopathy: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study

Keep in mind
The assessment covered short-term outcomes in acute radiculopathy using a specific 905-nm protocol. It does not establish nerve regeneration or lasting relief.

Published title
Low-Level Laser Therapy at 635 nm for Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study

Keep in mind
The study used a 635-nm laser and followed patients through eight weeks. It does not establish equivalent results with MLS or long-term prevention of recurrence.

Published title
The effect of low-level laser in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Keep in mind
The study used an 830-nm, 50-mW laser. Its small sample and different equipment limit conclusions about other devices or lasting structural changes.

Published title
A randomized controlled evaluation of low-intensity laser therapy: plantar fasciitis

Keep in mind
The negative result applies to its particular protocol. Together with later trials, it shows why laser settings and study design matter.

Published title
Efficacy and cortical mechanisms of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation in non-specific neck and low back pain: a prospective, two-center, randomized, sham-controlled fNIRS study

Keep in mind
The study measured immediate effects after one session; it does not establish lasting relief or the results of a full treatment course.

Published title
Comparative efficacy of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome

Keep in mind
All participants were women, all received exercise, and follow-up extended only one month after treatment.

Published title
Comparison of two repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation protocols for upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized trial

Keep in mind
There was no sham or untreated group. The study compares treatment durations rather than proving efficacy against placebo.

Published title
Effect of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Neck Myofascial Pain: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Crossover Trial

Keep in mind
This was a small trial with daily measurements over seven days; sustained benefit from repeated treatment remains uncertain.

Published title
Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Dynamic and Static Postural Control in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Keep in mind
The four-week study involved a small, relatively young sample and a combined treatment program; it does not demonstrate improvement in every balance or disability measure.

Published title
Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) in Subjects With Lumbar Radiculopathy: An Electromyography-guided Prospective, Randomized Study

Keep in mind
Both groups received magnetic stimulation, so this comparison cannot isolate its benefit against sham treatment or prove nerve regeneration.

Published title
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

Keep in mind
The small pilot also included other care, including physical therapy and medication. Larger studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Published title
Repetitive peripheral magnetic neurostimulation of multifidus muscles combined with motor training influences spine motor control and chronic low back pain

Keep in mind
Only 21 people participated, and stimulation was paired with supervised and home training. It does not establish the effect of stimulation alone.

Published title
Repetitive magnetic stimulation: a novel therapeutic approach for myofascial pain syndrome

Keep in mind
This older, small trial used a specific protocol and device. Its results should not be generalized to all neck pain or current magnetic systems.

Published title
The effect of repetitive magnetic stimulation on localized musculoskeletal pain

Keep in mind
This was an early, small study of short-term relief across localized pain problems, not evidence of tissue repair or permanent recovery.

Published title
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Keep in mind
The trial did not find advantages in cartilage thickness, joint-space width, walking and chair-standing performance, or patient-reported outcomes through 12 months. This is not evidence of cartilage regeneration.

Published title
Pulsed electromagnetic fields in knee osteoarthritis: a double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Keep in mind
The protocol involved 12 hours of daily use. Its results cannot be assumed for shorter in-office sessions or other devices.

Published title
Efficacy of Pulsed Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Therapy on Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Keep in mind
The groups did not differ in pain or disability at weeks six and thirteen. The study used a BEMER device and does not establish superiority over other treatments.

Published title
Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on nonspecific low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

Keep in mind
Both groups received physical therapy. The short study evaluated a specific 50-Hz, 20-Gauss protocol, and its reported pain confidence interval included no difference.

Published title
A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Keep in mind
Only 25 of 42 randomized participants completed the study. The pilot and its within-group improvements require confirmation in a larger trial.

Published title
Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic therapy for chronic lower back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Keep in mind
The trial involved 36 people and three weeks of treatment, with follow-up only four weeks after therapy.

Published title
The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of cervical osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial

Keep in mind
Only 34 patients participated. Treatment used a whole-body mat twice daily, so findings are specific to that protocol.

Published title
Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with pulsed electromagnetic fields: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Keep in mind
A stiffness finding in participants younger than 65 did not extend to pain or daily activities. Treatment required two hours daily, five days weekly, for six weeks.

Published title
The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Keep in mind
The mixed results from 55 patients highlight why improvements in individual measures should not be presented as proof of general effectiveness.

Published title
Pulsed magnetic field therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee--a double-blind sham-controlled trial

Keep in mind
Only 32 participants were included in the analysis. The home protocol required 84 half-hour sessions, which differs from typical office treatment.

Published title
Spinal manipulative therapy for adults with chronic low back pain

Keep in mind
The evidence was low to very low certainty, and treatment techniques, patient groups and schedules varied substantially. Adverse-event evidence was uncertain.

Published title
Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Keep in mind
Results differed considerably between studies. Temporary soreness, stiffness and increased pain were reported; these results do not establish long-term benefit.

Published title
Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial

Keep in mind
Chiropractic care included more than manipulation alone. This military population and short follow-up do not establish identical outcomes for all patients.

Published title
Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for care of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Keep in mind
Differences were negligible at the 24-week assessment. The study does not establish one ideal visit schedule for every patient.

Published title
Spinal manipulation and home exercise with advice for subacute and chronic back-related leg pain: a trial with adaptive allocation

Keep in mind
The leg-pain advantage was not statistically significant at one year. Patients and providers could not be blinded.

Published title
Spinal manipulation, medication, or home exercise with advice for acute and subacute neck pain: a randomized trial

Keep in mind
Participants and providers were not blinded. The findings do not show that manipulation is necessary or superior to home exercise for everyone.

Published title
Supervised exercise with and without spinal manipulation performs similarly and better than home exercise for chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Keep in mind
Adding manipulation did not clearly improve on supervised exercise alone. Differences in pain were smaller at one year.

Published title
Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for care of cervicogenic headache: a dual-center randomized controlled trial

Keep in mind
The trial was unblinded, and headache intensity did not show an important improvement. These findings concern cervicogenic headache, not every headache type.

Published title
Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial

Keep in mind
The comparison tested specific treatment programs without a sham group. Results should not be extended to migraines or all neck-treatment techniques.

Published title
Effect of Spinal Manipulative and Mobilization Therapies in Young Adults With Mild to Moderate Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Keep in mind
The participants were relatively young and received a specific three-week treatment course. The findings provide useful counterevidence but do not evaluate every patient group or care program.